Josephson v. Woods

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Josephson v. Woods

94 N.Y.S. 30

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 30 (Josephson v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Josephson v. Woods, 94 N.Y.S. 30 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is absolutely no reason why this appeal should have been taken. The questions in the case were questions of fact. Those questions of fact have been_ determined in favor of the defendant by the court, after it had an opportunity of hearing and seeing the witnesses. We will not interfere with the decision of the trial court.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is absolutely no reason why this appeal should have been taken. The questions in the case were questions of fact. Those questions of fact have been_ determined in favor of the defendant by the court, after it had an opportunity of hearing and seeing the witnesses. We will not interfere with the decision of the trial court.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y.S. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/josephson-v-woods-nyappterm-1905.