Josephson v. Wibrew

15 A.D.2d 533, 222 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7102
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1961·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In our opinion, the verdicts rendered by the jury for the damages for the death and for the pain and suffering were excessive. It is also our opinion that it was error to admit in evidence the photograph, but that the error may be disregarded pursuant to section 106 of the Civil Practice Act. The verdict with respect to the cause of action for conscious pain and suffering was erroneous in form but not as a matter of substance, and [534] may be corrected without the necessity of a new trial (Polsey v. Waldorf-Astoria, 216 App. Div. 86; Kinsey v. Spencer & Son Corp., 165 Misc. 143, affd. 255 App. Div. 995, affd. 281 N. Y. 601; Farber v. Demino, 254 N. Y. 363). In any event, the error becomes immaterial, in view of our determination with respect to the amount of such verdict. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Josephson v. Wibrew, 15 A.D.2d 533, 222 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

15 A.D.2d 533 (Josephson v. Wibrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stuart-Olver-Holtz, Inc. v. Green
49 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Caldecott v. Long Island Lighting Co.
417 F.2d 994 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Caldecott v. Long Island Lighting Company
417 F.2d 994 (Second Circuit, 1969)