Josephson v. Schwartz

225 A.D. 675
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment modified by providing therein that it is without prejudice, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, with costs. Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiff was entitled to recover nominal damages in any event, the rule is settled that appellate courts do not reverse judgments to enable the recovery of merely nominal damages. (Shapiro v. Benenson, 181 App. Div. 19, 27; National Cash Register Co. v. Schmidt, 48 id. 472, 474; Mosler Safe Co. v. Brenner, 100 Misc. 107; McConihe v. New York & Erie R. R. Co., 20 N. Y. 495, 498.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Josephson v. Schwartz, 225 A.D. 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

225 A.D. 675 (Josephson v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rusinko v. Plechavicius
57 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Castaldo v. Olikon
13 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)