Josephson v. Autry

99 So. 2d 230
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 18, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 So. 2d 230 (Josephson v. Autry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Josephson v. Autry, 99 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of attorneys for appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from by interlocutory appeal pursuant to the rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on interlocutory appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the inter[231]*231locutory order appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the order is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1985
State ex rel. Josephson v. Revels
100 So. 2d 813 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 So. 2d 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/josephson-v-autry-fla-1957.