Josephine Boyd v. Duc M Ta

Opinion

Opinion issued August 28, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00490-CV ——————————— JOSEPHINE BOYD, Appellant V. DUC M TA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024-39571

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Josephine Boyd appeals from a judgment signed June 1,

2025. Appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence

for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T

CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26,

2024). Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice of July 23, 2025, advising

appellant that if the fee was not paid, this appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal

of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),

43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.