Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 2, 2014
Docket02-14-00164-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq (Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00164-CV

JOSEPH YAMMINE APPELLANT

V.

EMAD SAUKI TAQ APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-002068-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Motion To Remand.” It is the court’s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s

judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court to

render judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388

(Tex. 1995).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: October 2, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-yammine-v-emad-sauki-taq-texapp-2014.