Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 2, 2014·No. 02-14-00164-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00164-CV

JOSEPH YAMMINE APPELLANT

V.

EMAD SAUKI TAQ APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-002068-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Motion To Remand.” It is the court’s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s

judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court to

render judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388

(Tex. 1995).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: October 2, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq (Joseph Yammine v. Emad Sauki Taq) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Innovative Office System, Inc. v. Johnson
911 S.W.2d 387 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)