Joseph Wayne Stroops v. United States
This text of 405 F.2d 1211 (Joseph Wayne Stroops v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
405 F.2d 1211
Joseph Wayne STROOPS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 21354.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
February 5, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge.
Charles T. Bumer, San Diego, Cal. (argued), for Stroops.
J. Perry Langford (argued), of Langford, Langford & Lane, San Diego, Cal., for Davis.
Phillip Johnson (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Edwin L. Miller, U. S. Atty., Philip W. Bumer (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty. (Stroops appeal), San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES, ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the matter remanded with instruction to the District Court to dismiss. Davis v. United States, 382 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 F.2d 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-wayne-stroops-v-united-states-ca9-1969.