Joseph W. v. Wyse

451 A.2d 652, 1982 Me. LEXIS 795
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 21, 1982
StatusPublished

This text of 451 A.2d 652 (Joseph W. v. Wyse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph W. v. Wyse, 451 A.2d 652, 1982 Me. LEXIS 795 (Me. 1982).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Seeking relief from alleged illegal detention and bail orders entered by the Juvenile Court, Joseph W. filed a petition for a common law writ of habeas corpus. After a hearing, the Superior Court, Cumberland County, dismissed the petition. Assuming without deciding that Joseph could invoke common law habeas corpus jurisdiction rather than a statutory appeal,1 we must nevertheless affirm the denial of relief. Prior to the hearing on the habeas corpus petition, Joseph W. was adjudicated to have committed a juvenile offense.2 The Superi- or Court properly determined that the adjudication rendered his petition for habeas corpus relief moot. On appeal, Joseph has failed to demonstrate that this case comes within any of the recognized exceptions to the mootness doctrine.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Joseph W.
451 A.2d 1197 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 A.2d 652, 1982 Me. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-w-v-wyse-me-1982.