Joseph W. Newman v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

886 F.2d 329, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14762, 1989 WL 111674
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 28, 1989·No. 88-1312·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

At the Commissioner’s request, the court has considered the application of 35 U.S.C. § 145 to the assessment of the costs of the appeal Newman v. Quigg, 877 F.2d 1575, 11 USPQ2d 1340 (Fed.Cir.1989).

Mr. Newman had filed a sparse Appendix; the Commissioner moved for permission to file a supplemental appendix, and duly filed nine volumes thereof. As Mr. Newman points out, the Commissioner’s appendix included material in violation of Fed.Cir.R. 30(a)(2) and 30(b). In light of all the circumstances, it is inappropriate to tax Mr. Newman with the costs of the Commissioner’s Appendix. Fed.R.App.P. 30(b).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The court’s judgment of July 5, 1989 is modified to the extent that Mr. Newman shall pay the taxable costs of this appeal except for the costs attributed to the Commissioner’s Appendix.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph W. Newman v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, 886 F.2d 329, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14762, 1989 WL 111674 (Fed. Cir. 1989).

886 F.2d 329 (Joseph W. Newman v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eli Lilly and Company v. Actavis Elizabeth
435 F. App'x 917 (Federal Circuit, 2011)