Joseph W. Accardi v. Control Data Corporation

869 F.2d 25, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 1989
Docket656, Docket 88-7749
StatusPublished

This text of 869 F.2d 25 (Joseph W. Accardi v. Control Data Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph W. Accardi v. Control Data Corporation, 869 F.2d 25, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982 (2d Cir. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs, 16 former employees of IBM and then Control Data Corporation (CDC), appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Whitman Knapp, J., granting summary judgment to defendant CDC in this action based on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. CDC sold one of its divisions to Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) in 1985, and plaintiffs are now employed by ADP. Nevertheless, they claim that they are still entitled to employee benefits from CDC.

The factual background of this case is summarized in a prior opinion of this court, reported at 836 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.1987), and a prior opinion of the district court, reported at 658 F.Supp. 881 (S.D.N.Y.1987). The district court, in that opinion, granted summary judgment for plaintiffs on the issue of severance benefits. This court reversed on that issue and ruled that the plan administrator had not, under ERISA, acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying severance benefits. However, we remanded to allow the district court to consider whether plaintiffs are entitled to continued overall benefits under a Benefits Agreement entered into by Control Data and IBM, plaintiffs’ previous employer.

On remand, the district court held for defendant principally on the ground that plaintiffs are no longer “eligible employees” according to the terms of the Benefits Agreement. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, reported at 704 F.Supp. 517 (S.D.N.Y.1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Accardi v. Control Data Corp.
658 F. Supp. 881 (S.D. New York, 1987)
Accardi v. Control Data Corp.
704 F. Supp. 517 (S.D. New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 F.2d 25, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-w-accardi-v-control-data-corporation-ca2-1989.