Joseph v. United States
61 Cust. Ct. 660
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1968
DocketNo. P68/456; protest 61/16631 (San Francisco); No. P68/457; protests 61/23078, etc. (San Francisco)
StatusPublished
This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 660 (Joseph v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Joseph v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 660 (cusc 1968).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of sledge hammers and sledge heads similar in all material respects to those the subject of James S. Baker (Imports) Co. and Ted L. Rausch et al. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 553, C.D. 3048), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James S. Baker (Imports) Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 553 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 Cust. Ct. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-united-states-cusc-1968.