Joseph v. Sulzberger

143 A.D. 901, 127 N.Y.S. 1126
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joseph v. Sulzberger. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 A.D. 499

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order should he modified so as to deny the motion of the defendant to vacate or modify the original order for the examination of the individual defendant and the defendant Sulzberger & Sons Company; the original order requiring the examination of both defendants reinstated, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff; the date of the examination to he fixed on the settlement of the order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Miller and Dowling, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph v. Sulzberger, 143 A.D. 901, 127 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

143 A.D. 901 (Joseph v. Sulzberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.