Joseph v. State
This text of 318 S.W.3d 323 (Joseph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Leonard Joseph (Joseph) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 amend *324 ed motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
318 S.W.3d 323, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082, 2010 WL 3314785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-state-moctapp-2010.