Joseph v. State

318 S.W.3d 323, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082, 2010 WL 3314785

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonard Joseph (Joseph) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 amend ed motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).