Joseph v. State
882 S.W.2d 153, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 1994 WL 241069
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after his plea of guilty to distributing a controlled substance near a school. Finding no clear error in such denial, we affirm. We also determine an extended opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by order opinion. Rule 84.-16(b)(2). A memorandum has been given to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph v. State, 882 S.W.2d 153, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 1994 WL 241069 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
882 S.W.2d 153 (Joseph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.