Joseph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Joseph v. State

830 So. 2d 911, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17159, 2002 WL 31557309

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 20, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-109

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 830 So. 2d 911 (Joseph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph v. State, 830 So. 2d 911, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17159, 2002 WL 31557309 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SHAHOOD, J.

We affirm appellant, Lou Joseph’s, conviction and sentence for burglary of an occupied dwelling. Appellant argues on appeal that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that appellant was guilty of burglary of an occupied dwelling and his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted. This argument made on appeal was not preserved in the trial court and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. See F.B. v. State, 816 So.2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(citing State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974)). We affirm all other issues raised without comment.

AFFIRMED.

STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHAHOOD, J.

We affirm appellant, Lou Joseph’s, conviction and sentence for burglary of an occupied dwelling. Appellant argues on appeal that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that appellant was guilty of burglary of an occupied dwelling and his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted. This argument made on appeal was not preserved in the trial court and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. See F.B. v. State, 816 So.2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(citing State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974)). We affirm all other issues raised without comment.

AFFIRMED.

STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

830 So. 2d 911, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17159, 2002 WL 31557309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack