Joseph v. Pennsylvania Railroad

New York Court of Appeals

Joseph v. Pennsylvania Railroad

190 N.E.2d 242, 12 N.Y.2d 1056

DecidedMarch 28, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.E.2d 242 (Joseph v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 190 N.E.2d 242, 12 N.Y.2d 1056 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum : On this record plaintiff had a fair and impartial trial and reasonable advance notice of the charges. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fund, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis concurs in result only upon the ground that a cause of action for damages under these circumstances does not lie.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum : On this record plaintiff had a fair and impartial trial and reasonable advance notice of the charges. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fund, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis concurs in result only upon the ground that a cause of action for damages under these circumstances does not lie.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 N.E.2d 242, 12 N.Y.2d 1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ny-1963.