Joseph v. New York University Medical Center
This text of 422 N.E.2d 818 (Joseph v. New York University Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
At issue on this appeal is not, as appellant contends, the weight of the evidence but whether the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that appellant failed to establish discrimination is supported by substantial evidence. On this record, we cannot say that there was not or that the division’s determination was arbitrary and capricious.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
422 N.E.2d 818, 53 N.Y.2d 833, 440 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-new-york-university-medical-center-ny-1981.