Joseph v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joseph v. New York City Transit Authority

68 A.D.2d 880, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.2d 880 (Joseph v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph v. New York City Transit Authority, 68 A.D.2d 880, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

[881]*881Appeals by defendant (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 10, 1978, which granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated May 5, 1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated March 10, 1978 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. This order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated May 5, 1978 affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The question of the applicability of the New York City Building Code provisions is best left to the trial court. O’Connor, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Mangano, JJ., concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[881]*881Appeals by defendant (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 10, 1978, which granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated May 5, 1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated March 10, 1978 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. This order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated May 5, 1978 affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The question of the applicability of the New York City Building Code provisions is best left to the trial court. O’Connor, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Mangano, JJ., concur.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.2d 880, 413 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1979.