Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Joseph v. MTA, New York City Transit

Joseph v. MTA, New York City Transit

109 A.D.3d 825, 971 N.Y.S.2d 63
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 11, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.3d 825 (Joseph v. MTA, New York City Transit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph v. MTA, New York City Transit, 109 A.D.3d 825, 971 N.Y.S.2d 63 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award dated April 18, 2011, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Landicino, J.), dated May 30, 2012, which, in effect, granted the motion of MTA, New York City Transit, to dismiss the petition as time-barred, and directed the entry of judgment in favor of MTA, New York City Transit, and against him dismissing the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly directed the dismissal of the proceeding as time-barred (see Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438 [1997]; Matter of McRae v New York City Tr. Auth., 39 AD3d 861 [2007]). Dillon, J.E, Roman, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Case v. Monroe Community College
677 N.E.2d 279 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
McRae v. New York City Transit Authority
39 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A.D.3d 825, 971 N.Y.S.2d 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-mta-new-york-city-transit-nyappdiv-2013.