Joseph v. Moriarty, Alias Michael And/or Michel Pitcher, Alias Joseph Petrick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

208 F.2d 43, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 413
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 5, 1953
Docket11672_1
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 208 F.2d 43 (Joseph v. Moriarty, Alias Michael And/or Michel Pitcher, Alias Joseph Petrick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph v. Moriarty, Alias Michael And/or Michel Pitcher, Alias Joseph Petrick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 208 F.2d 43, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 413 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued a jeopardy assessment determining deficiencies against petitioner for income taxes, together with fraud and delinquency penalties, for twelve taxable years for which no returns had been filed. These deficiencies were increased by the Commissioner in an amended answer to the petitioner’s petition in the Tax Court. Petitioner took the position that all of the deficiencies were arbitrary on their face and that the Commissioner had the entire burden of proof not only with respect to the fraud penalties asserted in the assessment and deficiencies in tax asserted in the amended answer but also with respect to the deficiencies in tax and the delinquency penalties, asserted in the assessment. He rested this position on the authority of Helvering v. Taylor 1 and offered no evidence. The Tax Court rejected this position, and upon the evidence introduced by the Commissioner made findings of fact in his favor on all issues. Petitioner brought this petition for review from the decision entered pursuant thereto.

The findings are amply supported by the record. We, therefore, affirm the decision of the Tax Court for the reasons relied upon in its opinion. 2

Affirmed.

1

. 1935, 293 U.S. 507, 55 S.Ct. 287, 79 L.Ed. 623.

2

. 1952, 18 T.C. 327.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lary v. United States
608 F. Supp. 258 (N.D. Alabama, 1985)
Barnhill v. Commissioner
1983 T.C. Memo. 375 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)
M. J. Laputka & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner
1981 T.C. Memo. 730 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Luna v. Commissioner
1975 T.C. Memo. 190 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)
Hinson v. Commissioner
1967 T.C. Memo. 15 (U.S. Tax Court, 1967)
Kramer v. Commissioner
1966 T.C. Memo. 234 (U.S. Tax Court, 1966)
Mears v. Commissioner
1966 T.C. Memo. 173 (U.S. Tax Court, 1966)
Estate of Maceo v. Comm'r
1964 T.C. Memo. 46 (U.S. Tax Court, 1964)
Estate of Wright v. Commissioner
1963 T.C. Memo. 88 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
Bishop v. Commissioner
1962 T.C. Memo. 146 (U.S. Tax Court, 1962)
Missisquoi Corp. v. Commissioner
37 T.C. 791 (U.S. Tax Court, 1962)
Banks v. Commissioner
1961 T.C. Memo. 237 (U.S. Tax Court, 1961)
Ehrlich v. Commissioner
31 T.C. 536 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 F.2d 43, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-moriarty-alias-michael-andor-michel-pitcher-alias-joseph-cadc-1953.