Joseph v. Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joseph v. Joseph

203 A.D.2d 572, 612 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Cozier, J.), dated June 8, 1992, denying the appellant’s motion to vacate an order of protection entered upon his default in appearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the order of protection by its terms expired on February 20, 1993, the instant appeal is academic (see, Matter of Brown v Brown, 185 AD2d 812; Matter of McClure v McClure, 176 AD2d 325; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444). Miller, J. P., Lawrence, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Cozier, J.), dated June 8, 1992, denying the appellant’s motion to vacate an order of protection entered upon his default in appearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the order of protection by its terms expired on February 20, 1993, the instant appeal is academic (see, Matter of Brown v Brown, 185 AD2d 812; Matter of McClure v McClure, 176 AD2d 325; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444). Miller, J. P., Lawrence, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Joseph v. Joseph, 203 A.D.2d 572, 612 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

203 A.D.2d 572 (Joseph v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related