Joseph v. Joseph

203 A.D.2d 572, 612 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 25, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 572 (Joseph v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph v. Joseph, 203 A.D.2d 572, 612 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Cozier, J.), dated June 8, 1992, denying the appellant’s motion to vacate an order of protection entered upon his default in appearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the order of protection by its terms expired on February 20, 1993, the instant appeal is academic (see, Matter of Brown v Brown, 185 AD2d 812; Matter of McClure v McClure, 176 AD2d 325; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444). Miller, J. P., Lawrence, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schreiber v. Schreiber
2 A.D.3d 1094 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 572, 612 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-joseph-nyappdiv-1994.