Joseph v. Joseph
884 So. 2d 987, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14266, 2004 WL 2169003
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joseph v. Joseph. Read the opinion of the Court — 871 So. 2d 985 →
Opinion
On appeal from an Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, the former husband points out that the trial court failed to take into account distribution of a profit-sharing account to the former wife in what was an otherwise exemplary job in equitably distributing marital assets. Accordingly, we modify the judgment to require the former wife to pay the former husband $9,000. We find no merit in the appeal otherwise, and deny the cross-appeal. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph v. Joseph, 884 So. 2d 987, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14266, 2004 WL 2169003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
884 So. 2d 987 (Joseph v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.