Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Joseph v. East Penn Trucking Co.

Joseph v. East Penn Trucking Co.

193 A.D.2d 465, 598 N.Y.S.2d 708
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 465 (Joseph v. East Penn Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph v. East Penn Trucking Co., 193 A.D.2d 465, 598 N.Y.S.2d 708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered May 8, 1992, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It was not an abuse of discretion to grant plaintiffs cross motion to serve an amended bill of particulars absent a showing by defendant that the amended bill of particulars would cause it prejudice (Scarangello v State of New York, 111 AD2d 798; Koch v St. Francis Hosp., 112 AD2d 142). The amendment will not preclude cross-examination on, or diminish the importance of, the earlier inconsistency (Gonzalez v Colella, 55 AD2d 534). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. Colella
55 A.D.2d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Scarangello v. State
111 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Koch v. St. Francis Hospital
112 A.D.2d 142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 A.D.2d 465, 598 N.Y.S.2d 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-east-penn-trucking-co-nyappdiv-1993.