Joseph v. CSX Transportation Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Joseph v. CSX Transportation Co.

728 N.E.2d 1079, 89 Ohio St. 3d 111

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 2000

DocketNo. 99-826

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 728 N.E.2d 1079 (Joseph v. CSX Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph v. CSX Transportation Co., 728 N.E.2d 1079, 89 Ohio St. 3d 111 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated for lack of jurisdiction, Cicco v. Stockmaster (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 95, 728 N.E.2d 1066, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated to the extent that it decided issues other than constitutional questions.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. [112]*112Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated for lack of jurisdiction, Cicco v. Stockmaster (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 95, 728 N.E.2d 1066, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated to the extent that it decided issues other than constitutional questions.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. [112]*112Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

728 N.E.2d 1079, 89 Ohio St. 3d 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-csx-transportation-co-ohio-2000.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack