Joseph v. City of Buffalo
167 A.D.2d 830, 562 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14367
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 167 A.D.2d 830 (Joseph v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Joseph v. City of Buffalo, 167 A.D.2d 830, 562 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinions
Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In affirming Supreme Court we note that the dissenters stretch to reach a result which was not requested before Special Term or on appeal.
All concur, except Denman and Balio, JJ., who dissent in part and vote to modify, in the following memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Joseph v. City of Buffalo
187 A.D.2d 946 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 830, 562 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1990.