Joseph v. Chicago City Railway Co.

202 Ill. App. 159
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 27, 1916
DocketGen. No. 22,464
StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 159 (Joseph v. Chicago City Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph v. Chicago City Railway Co., 202 Ill. App. 159 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Negligence, § 196*—when manner of occurrence of accident question for jury. Where the evidence is in inextricable conflict as to the manner of the occurrence of an accident, and the credibility of the witnesses is a strong factor in the solution of the questions in dispute, it becomes in the first instance the province of the jury' to reconcile the evidence, if possible, and to determine the facts therefrom. 2. Appeal and ebbo|¡, § 1778*—when incumbent on Appellate Court to reverse jury’s findings of fact. Where it is patent' that the verdict of a jury is manifestly contrary to the preponderating force of the evidence, it is incumbent on the Appellate Court to reverse with findings of fact. 3. Carriers, § 476*—when evidence does not justify verdict for passenger thrown from street car. In an action for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the plaintiff’s being thrown from the steps of a street car as a result of its being started with a violent jerk while he was in the act of alighting, evidence as to the manner of the occurrence of the accident, held not to justify a verdict for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 Ill. App. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-chicago-city-railway-co-illappct-1916.