Joseph v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Joseph v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX

66 So. 3d 557, 2011 WL 2020254

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 25, 2011·No. 11-0003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PETERS, J.

For the reasons assigned in Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex, 11-2 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/25/11), 66 So.3d 539, we affirm the trial court judgment in favor of Dai’Jhnea Joseph, Steven Joseph, and Constance Joseph in all respects. We assess all costs of this appeal to the defendants, Centerpoint Energy Entex; Centerpoint Energy Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Marketing, Inc.; Entex Gas Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Gas Services, Inc.; Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; and Reliant Energy Resources Corporation.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETERS, J.

For the reasons assigned in Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex, 11-2 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/25/11), 66 So.3d 539, we affirm the trial court judgment in favor of Dai’Jhnea Joseph, Steven Joseph, and Constance Joseph in all respects. We assess all costs of this appeal to the defendants, Centerpoint Energy Entex; Centerpoint Energy Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Marketing, Inc.; Entex Gas Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Gas Services, Inc.; Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; and Reliant Energy Resources Corporation.

AFFIRMED.

Joseph v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX, 66 So. 3d 557, 2011 WL 2020254 (La. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

66 So. 3d 557 (Joseph v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related