Joseph v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX

66 So. 3d 557, 2011 WL 2020254
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 25, 2011
Docket11-0003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 So. 3d 557 (Joseph v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX, 66 So. 3d 557, 2011 WL 2020254 (La. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PETERS, J.

For the reasons assigned in Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex, 11-2 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/25/11), 66 So.3d 539, we affirm the trial court judgment in favor of Dai’Jhnea Joseph, Steven Joseph, and Constance Joseph in all respects. We assess all costs of this appeal to the defendants, Centerpoint Energy Entex; Centerpoint Energy Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Marketing, Inc.; Entex Gas Resources Corporation; Centerpoint Energy Gas Services, Inc.; Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; and Reliant Energy Resources Corporation.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex
66 So. 3d 539 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 So. 3d 557, 2011 WL 2020254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-centerpoint-energy-entex-lactapp-2011.