Joseph Urtado v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 8, 2010
Docket03-09-00646-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Joseph Urtado v. State (Joseph Urtado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Urtado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-09-00646-CR

Joseph Urtado, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-09-904068, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



PER CURIAM



Joseph Urtado appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault. The clerk's record, which was due to be filed on December 21, 2009, has not been filed. Urtado's retained counsel has filed a motion seeking to withdraw as attorney of record. The motion further states that Urtado is indigent and requires appointed counsel at this time. It appears that no request for a free record has been filed and no finding of indigency has been made by the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2.

To avoid further delays and protect the rights of the parties, the appeal is abated and the trial court is instructed to determine, following a hearing if necessary, whether Urtado is presently indigent. If the court finds that Urtado is indigent, it shall order the preparation of the record at no cost to Urtado, and take all necessary steps to assure that Urtado is effectively represented by counsel, including appointing new counsel for the appeal if necessary. Unless and until new counsel is appointed, Jodi Callaway Cole remains counsel of record. (1) Copies of all findings, conclusions, and orders, as well as a transcription of the reporter's notes if a hearing is held, shall be tendered for filing in this Court no later than February 8, 2010.



Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Filed: January 8, 2010

Do Not Publish

1. At this time, we take no action on counsel's motion to withdraw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph Urtado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-urtado-v-state-texapp-2010.