Joseph Thomas v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 2018
Docket17-2253
StatusUnpublished

This text of Joseph Thomas v. United States (Joseph Thomas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Thomas v. United States, (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2253

JOSEPH S. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:16-cv-12337)

Submitted: April 26, 2018 Decided: May 3, 2018

Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monica T. Monday, Leslie S. Bowers, GENTRY LOCKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Mark B. Stern, Dennis Fan, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Michael B. Stuart, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph S. Thomas appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in

favor of the United States on his Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) suit. Because the

district court properly declined to apply West Virginia law governing equitable tolling,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. United States, No. 5:16-

cv-12337 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 2, 2017). See Anderson v. United States, 669 F.3d 161, 164

(4th Cir. 2011) (noting that federal law defines the limitations period for suits under the

FTCA). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. United States
669 F.3d 161 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph Thomas v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-thomas-v-united-states-ca4-2018.