Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Co.

187 Ill. App. 640
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided July 31, 1914·No. Gen. No. 5,934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Whitney

delivered the opinion of the court.

7. Continuance, § 60*—necessity of striking motion from files after ruling thereon. Where a motion for a continuance has been denied by the court, it is unnecessary to strike the motion from the files, and it is not proper to do so. 8. Appeal and error, § 1568*—when error of clerk in entering up default harmless. Error of the clerk in entering up a default judgment, by writing it up as a judgment for want of an “appearance” instead of for want of a “plea,” held not reversible error. 9. Judgment, § 126*—remedy when entry of default ■irregular. Where the entering of a default judgment was irregular, held it was the duty of the defendant, on appearing in court the next day and during the same term of court, to have moved to set aside the judgment instead of taking an appeal. 10. Costs, § 67*—damages for prosecuting appeal for delay. Four hundred dollars allowed as damages for prosecuting an appeal for delay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Co., 187 Ill. App. 640 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

187 Ill. App. 640 (Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. Crawford Locomotive & Car Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whalen v. Twin City Barge & Gravel Co.
280 Ill. App. 596 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1935)
Dewar v. Loy
248 Ill. App. 396 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)