Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs

Third Circuit

Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs

101 F. 989, 42 C.C.A. 127, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 21, 1900·No. No. 9·Published

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

Attentive consideration of this record and of the arguments of counsel has led us all to the conclusion which was arrived at by the court below. 99 Fed. 87. The opinion which was filed by the learned judge of that court has our entire concurrence. We might, of course, express the same views in different terms and at greater length, but no useful purpose would be subserved by doing so. The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

Attentive consideration of this record and of the arguments of counsel has led us all to the conclusion which was arrived at by the court below. 99 Fed. 87. The opinion which was filed by the learned judge of that court has our entire concurrence. We might, of course, express the same views in different terms and at greater length, but no useful purpose would be subserved by doing so. The decree is affirmed.

Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs, 101 F. 989, 42 C.C.A. 127, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497 (3d Cir. 1900).

Pincite

101 F. 989 (Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related