Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs

Third Circuit

Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs

101 F. 989, 42 C.C.A. 127, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1900

DocketNo. 9

StatusPublished

This text of 101 F. 989 (Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph Stelwagon Co. v. Childs, 101 F. 989, 42 C.C.A. 127, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497 (3d Cir. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

Attentive consideration of this record and of the arguments of counsel has led us all to the conclusion which was arrived at by the court below. 99 Fed. 87. The opinion which was filed by the learned judge of that court has our entire concurrence. We might, of course, express the same views in different terms and at greater length, but no useful purpose would be subserved by doing so. The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

Attentive consideration of this record and of the arguments of counsel has led us all to the conclusion which was arrived at by the court below. 99 Fed. 87. The opinion which was filed by the learned judge of that court has our entire concurrence. We might, of course, express the same views in different terms and at greater length, but no useful purpose would be subserved by doing so. The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 F. 989, 42 C.C.A. 127, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-stelwagon-co-v-childs-ca3-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack