Joseph Smith v. E. McDaniel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2010·No. 08-99004·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 12 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH WELDON SMITH, No. 08-99004

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-CV-00318-JCM-

RJJ

v.

E.K. MCDANIEL, Warden, ORDER *

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2010 San Francisco, California

Before: KLEINFELD and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY, District Judge.**

Under Thompson v. Frank, 599 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2010) (per

curiam), we lack appellate jurisdiction to review the district court’s stay-and-

abeyance order. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph Smith v. E. McDaniel, (9th Cir. 2010).

Joseph Smith v. E. McDaniel (Joseph Smith v. E. McDaniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Frank
599 F.3d 1088 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)