Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company

Fifth Circuit

Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company

483 F.2d 67, 1 BNA OSHC 1294, 1 OSHC (BNA) 1294, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8295

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 17, 1973

Docket73-2100

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 483 F.2d 67 (Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company, 483 F.2d 67, 1 BNA OSHC 1294, 1 OSHC (BNA) 1294, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8295 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The complaint in this case rest on the theory that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678, carries an implied private remedy against executive officers of an employer guilty of violating the Act. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court we hold that the Act does not create such an implied remedy. See 356 F.Supp. 670.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The complaint in this case rest on the theory that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678, carries an implied private remedy against executive officers of an employer guilty of violating the Act. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court we hold that the Act does not create such an implied remedy. See 356 F.Supp. 670.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 F.2d 67, 1 BNA OSHC 1294, 1 OSHC (BNA) 1294, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-skidmore-jr-v-travelers-insurance-company-ca5-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack