Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company
483 F.2d 67, 1 BNA OSHC 1294, 1 OSHC (BNA) 1294, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8295
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 17, 1973·No. 73-2100·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The complaint in this case rest on the theory that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678, carries an implied private remedy against executive officers of an employer guilty of violating the Act. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court we hold that the Act does not create such an implied remedy. See 356 F.Supp. 670.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company, 483 F.2d 67, 1 BNA OSHC 1294, 1 OSHC (BNA) 1294, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8295 (5th Cir. 1973).
483 F.2d 67 (Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carroll v. Getty Oil Co.
498 F. Supp. 409 (D. Delaware, 1980)
Federal Employees for Non-Smokers' Rights v. United States
446 F. Supp. 181 (District of Columbia, 1978)
Horn v. C. L. Osborn Contracting Co.
423 F. Supp. 801 (M.D. Georgia, 1976)
Knight v. Burns, Kirkley & Williams Const. Co., Inc.
331 So. 2d 651 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976)
Ve-Ri-Tas, Inc. v. Advertising Review Council of Metropolitan Denver, Inc.
411 F. Supp. 1012 (D. Colorado, 1976)