Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 So. 3d 810 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 2020·No. 19-3384·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH SILKY, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D19-3384

[April 16, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Tim Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-1182 CF10A.

Joseph Silky, Jacksonville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.