JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 2020
Docket19-3384
StatusPublished

This text of JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH SILKY, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D19-3384

[April 16, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Tim Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-1182 CF10A.

Joseph Silky, Jacksonville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
JOSEPH SILKY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-silky-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.