Joseph Sica v. United States

408 F.2d 381

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 26, 1969·No. 23031_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

408 F.2d 381

Joseph SICA, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 23031.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 28, 1969.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1969.

Certiorari Denied May 26, 1969.

See 89 S.Ct. 1773.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Irving Praeger, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Wm. M. Byrne, U. S. Atty., Rober D. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

F. Filmore Jaffe (argued), of Jaffe, Osterman & Soll, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Before BARNES, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed. Cf. Aldridge v. United States, 405 F.2d 831 (9th Cir., decided January 17, 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

408 F.2d 381

Joseph SICA, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 23031.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 28, 1969.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1969.

Certiorari Denied May 26, 1969.

See 89 S.Ct. 1773.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Irving Praeger, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Wm. M. Byrne, U. S. Atty., Rober D. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

F. Filmore Jaffe (argued), of Jaffe, Osterman & Soll, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Before BARNES, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed. Cf. Aldridge v. United States, 405 F.2d 831 (9th Cir., decided January 17, 1969).

Joseph Sica v. United States, 408 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

408 F.2d 381 (Joseph Sica v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.