Joseph Sica v. United States
This text of 408 F.2d 381 (Joseph Sica v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
408 F.2d 381
Joseph SICA, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 23031.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
January 28, 1969.
Rehearing Denied March 5, 1969.
Certiorari Denied May 26, 1969.
See 89 S.Ct. 1773.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Irving Praeger, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Wm. M. Byrne, U. S. Atty., Rober D. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
F. Filmore Jaffe (argued), of Jaffe, Osterman & Soll, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Before BARNES, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed. Cf. Aldridge v. United States, 405 F.2d 831 (9th Cir., decided January 17, 1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 F.2d 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-sica-v-united-states-ca9-1969.