Joseph Samuel Young v. Phyllis Hill Young

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 15, 2007
Docket14-07-00488-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Joseph Samuel Young v. Phyllis Hill Young (Joseph Samuel Young v. Phyllis Hill Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Samuel Young v. Phyllis Hill Young, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 15, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 15, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00488-CV

JOSEPH SAMUEL YOUNG, Appellant

V.

PHYLLIS HILL YOUNG, Appellee

On Appeal from the 308th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-10011

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed April 27, 2007.  No clerk=s record has been filed.  Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence in this court.  On July 12, 2007, this court issued an order, directing appellant to file an affidavit of indigence in the trial court on or before July 30, 2007.  Appellant failed to comply with this court=s order.


On September 7, 2007, this court issued an order, stating the appeal would be dismissed unless appellant paid the filing fee of $125 and presented proof to this court on or before October 12, 2007, that appellant had made financial arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  On October 10, 2007, appellant filed a motion, requesting an extension of time to pay the filing fee and to make financial arrangements for the record and requesting that he be allowed to pay for the filing fee and record in small, monthly installments.  On October 18, 2007, this court issued another order, granting the extension of time to pay the filing fee and for the record until October 29, 2007, but denied appellant=s request to make monthly installments.

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record and has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 15, 2007.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Fowler, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph Samuel Young v. Phyllis Hill Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-samuel-young-v-phyllis-hill-young-texapp-2007.