Joseph Rotberg & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Joseph Rotberg & Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 406, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 267

United States Customs Court·Decided April 1, 1953·No. No. 57237; protests 60027-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Joseph Rotberg & Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 406, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 267 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 406 (Joseph Rotberg & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related