Joseph Ridley and Woody Jenkins v. Cecil McCall Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Etc.

496 F.2d 213, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7939
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 1974
Docket73-2923
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 496 F.2d 213 (Joseph Ridley and Woody Jenkins v. Cecil McCall Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Ridley and Woody Jenkins v. Cecil McCall Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Etc., 496 F.2d 213, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7939 (5th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a § 1983 suit attacking on a broad front the practices of the Georgia Parole Board. The District Court dismissed the complaint without issuing a show cause order requiring a factual response by the State or holding any evidentiary hearing. The District Court was of the view that this result was compelled by this Court’s en banc decision in Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 5 Cir., 1973, 477 F.2d 278. Subsequently the judgment of this Court was vacated and remanded for determination of whether the case was moot, Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 1973, 414 U.S. 809, 94 S.Ct. 79, 38 L.Ed.2d 44, and thereafter this Court by order vacated the judgment of the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. Consequently, Scarpa has no precedential value.

In view of this we think the interest of orderly administration calls for remand to the District Court for reconsideration. Since these sometime awesome constitutional principles ought not to be explored in a non-factual setting, the Court should take appropriate steps to assure development of the actual facts, not just the pleaded contention of the parties.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central Pines Land Co. v. United States
274 F.3d 881 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Gilbert v. Milliken & Co.
836 F. Supp. 856 (N.D. Georgia, 1992)
Cruz v. Skelton
543 F.2d 86 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Davis v. United States
415 F. Supp. 1086 (D. Kansas, 1976)
Cicero v. Olgiati
410 F. Supp. 1080 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Blake v. Massachusetts Parole Board
341 N.E.2d 902 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)
Mitchell v. Sigler
389 F. Supp. 1012 (N.D. Georgia, 1975)
Cook v. Whiteside
505 F.2d 32 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Samuel K. Garafola v. Charles L. Benson, Warden
505 F.2d 1212 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 F.2d 213, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-ridley-and-woody-jenkins-v-cecil-mccall-chairman-state-board-of-ca5-1974.