Joseph Ray Morrison v. State
This text of Joseph Ray Morrison v. State (Joseph Ray Morrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ September 05, 2019
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A20A0045. JOSEPH RAY MORRISON v. THE STATE.
Joseph Ray Morrison, through trial counsel, filed a motion to remand this appeal for a hearing on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Morrison’s motion is hereby GRANTED, and we REMAND the case to the trial court for appropriate proceedings concerning the issue of ineffective assistance, which have not yet been waived. See Ruiz v. State, 286 Ga. 146, 149 (2) (b) (686 SE2d 253) (2009). Furthermore, because “trial counsel be cannot reasonably or ethically be expected to assert or argue his or her own ineffectiveness,” the trial court should ensure that Morrison has conflict-free counsel appointed to represent him on remand.1 See Garland v. State, 283 Ga. 201, 205 (657 SE2d 842) (2008). Upon entry of an any further appealable order, Morrison shall have 30 days to file a new notice of appeal.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/05/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
1 In his motion, Morrison maintains that he “is in the process of securing new [appellate] counsel.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph Ray Morrison v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-ray-morrison-v-state-gactapp-2019.