Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Rennert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Rennert

259 A.D.2d 334, 684 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 334 (Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Rennert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Rennert, 259 A.D.2d 334, 684 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about June 5, 1998, which, in an action for fraudulent conveyance by a judgment creditor against the judgment debtor, the debtor’s transferee and a principal of both the debtor and the transferee, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied absent evidence of, among other things, the time of the challenged transfers, the value of the property transferred, and the extent of and reasons for any overlap between the two corporations’ clientele and staff. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Williams and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about June 5, 1998, which, in an action for fraudulent conveyance by a judgment creditor against the judgment debtor, the debtor’s transferee and a principal of both the debtor and the transferee, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied absent evidence of, among other things, the time of the challenged transfers, the value of the property transferred, and the extent of and reasons for any overlap between the two corporations’ clientele and staff. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Williams and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 334, 684 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-p-day-realty-corp-v-rennert-nyappdiv-1999.