Joseph Nance v. Atika Abdurrahim
This text of Joseph Nance v. Atika Abdurrahim (Joseph Nance v. Atika Abdurrahim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 7, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00133-CV ——————————— JOSEPH NANCE, Appellant V. ATIKA ABDURRAHIM, Appellee
On Appeal from the 246th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-11750
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Joseph Nance has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order, Fees Charged in the
Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).
After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).
We therefore dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph Nance v. Atika Abdurrahim, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-nance-v-atika-abdurrahim-texapp-2024.