Joseph N. Tooni v. Eugene Zuckert, Etc., Daniel L. Edwards, Jr. v. Eugene Zuckert, Etc.
This text of 412 F.2d 228 (Joseph N. Tooni v. Eugene Zuckert, Etc., Daniel L. Edwards, Jr. v. Eugene Zuckert, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph N. TOONI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Eugene ZUCKERT, etc., Defendant-Appellee.
Daniel L. EDWARDS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Eugene ZUCKERT, etc., Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 18228, 18229.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 16, 1968.
William R. Coen, Dayton, Ohio, Coen & Way, Dayton, Ohio, on brief for appellants.
Roger J. Makley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dayton, Ohio, Robert M. Draper, U.S. Atty., Dayton, Ohio, on brief for appellee.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges.
ORDER.
In these consolidated cases Appellants appeal from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton, sustaining the action of the Secretary of the Air Force in removing the Appellants from civil service employment by the United States Department of Air Force.
Upon consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we find no procedural rights were denied the Appellants; and, considering the record as a whole find there was substantial evidence to sustain the removals.
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it is, hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 F.2d 228, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-n-tooni-v-eugene-zuckert-etc-daniel-l-edwards-jr-v-eugene-ca6-1968.