Joseph Miller-Evans v. Metropolitan Police Department
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 24-7008 September Term, 2024 1:23-cv-02312-UNA Filed On: February 20, 2025 Joseph Miller-Evans,
Appellant v.
Metropolitan Police Department and Bryan Kasul, DC Metropolitan Police Detective,
Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Millett, Wilkins, and Rao, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 8, 2023, be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that appellant failed to articulate a basis for the district court’s jurisdiction in the complaint. See Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Ass’n, Inc. v. McDonald, 830 F.3d 570, 574 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (the party claiming subject matter jurisdiction has the burden of establishing it).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk
BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph Miller-Evans v. Metropolitan Police Department (Joseph Miller-Evans v. Metropolitan Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.