Joseph Miceli and Maria Miceli v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

193 So. 3d 12, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2722
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 2016
Docket4D15-2910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 So. 3d 12 (Joseph Miceli and Maria Miceli v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Miceli and Maria Miceli v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., 193 So. 3d 12, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2722 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH MICELI and MARIA MICELI, Appellants,

v.

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D15-2910

[February 24, 2016]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Roger B. Colton, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012CA5149.

Richard R. Widell, Margery E. Golant and Stuart M. Golant of Golant & Golant, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Jeremy W. Harris and David F. Knobel of Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, Chtd., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellants have not preserved the claim of error for review, we affirm the non-final order on appeal, which determines that the motion to quash service of process was moot. However, before the trial court rules on the pending motion to quash re-service of process, it must determine the validity of the original service of process from 2014. See Vidal v. SunTrust Bank, 41 So. 3d 401, 404 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“The validity of the original service must first be determined before the trial court can rule on the pending motion [to quash the second service].”).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz v. Citimortgage, Inc.
197 So. 3d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 3d 12, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-miceli-and-maria-miceli-v-bank-of-new-york-mellon-trust-company-fladistctapp-2016.