Joseph Mendoza and Vanessa Acosta v. Rachel Laney
This text of Joseph Mendoza and Vanessa Acosta v. Rachel Laney (Joseph Mendoza and Vanessa Acosta v. Rachel Laney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00173-CV ___________________________
JOSEPH MENDOZA AND VANESSA ACOSTA, Appellants
V.
RACHEL LANEY, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023-001713-1
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellants’ brief was due on September 11, 2023, but no brief was filed. See
Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On September 25, 2023, we warned Appellants that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, they filed a brief
and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See Tex.
R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than ten days have passed, but we have
not received a response.
Because Appellants have failed to file a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: October 26, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph Mendoza and Vanessa Acosta v. Rachel Laney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-mendoza-and-vanessa-acosta-v-rachel-laney-texapp-2023.