Joseph Maldonado Vasquez v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Joseph Maldonado Vasquez v. United States

378 F.2d 61, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6496

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1967

Docket21281

StatusPublished

This text of 378 F.2d 61 (Joseph Maldonado Vasquez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph Maldonado Vasquez v. United States, 378 F.2d 61, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6496 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was charged and found guilty on two separate counts of the possession and sale of narcotics, knowing the heroin had been illegally imported into the United States.

Three errors are alleged:

(1) The court allowed a .government agent to remain in the courtroom when the informer testified.

(2) Entrapment as a matter of law.

(3) Alleged insufficiency of the evidence.

We find no merit in any point, and af- . firm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI