Joseph M. Gersten, P.A. v. Mitrani

507 So. 2d 779, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1325, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8447
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1987·No. No. 87-236·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court’s order changing venue constituted error, we reverse the Order on Motion for Change of Venue without prejudice to appellees requesting the administrative judge to reassign the case within the circuit or, if necessary, to obtain a judge from another circuit. Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.050; see In re Estate of Carlton, 378 So.2d 1212 (Fla.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 922, 100 S.Ct. 3013, 65 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1980).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph M. Gersten, P.A. v. Mitrani, 507 So. 2d 779, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1325, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8447 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

507 So. 2d 779 (Joseph M. Gersten, P.A. v. Mitrani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SAFETY NAT. CAS., CORP. v. Florida Mun. Ins. Trust
818 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)