Joseph Ludena Mendoza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 552 F. App'x 758 (Joseph Ludena Mendoza v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Joseph Howard Ludena Mendoza, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, and for substantial evidence the agency’s factual determinations. Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 345 F.3d 824, 832 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determinations that Ludena Mendoza failed to establish he had been inspected and admitted into the United States, and that Ludena Mendoza therefore is not eligible for adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a) (setting forth requirements for adjustment of status); 8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(d) (stating that applicant bears the burden of establishing eligibility for relief from removal).
Ludena Mendoza’s claim that the agency employed an unclear standard and failed to develop the record is unsupported by the record.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
552 F. App'x 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-ludena-mendoza-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2014.