Joseph L. Silverburg v. Charles Tackett, Officially and Individually

831 F.2d 297, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13850, 1987 WL 38690
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 1987
Docket87-5049
StatusUnpublished

This text of 831 F.2d 297 (Joseph L. Silverburg v. Charles Tackett, Officially and Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph L. Silverburg v. Charles Tackett, Officially and Individually, 831 F.2d 297, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13850, 1987 WL 38690 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

831 F.2d 297

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Joseph L. SILVERBURG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles TACKETT, Officially and Individually, Defendant-Appellee

No. 87-5049.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1987.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge KEITH and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Plaintiff requests counsel on appeal from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint. Upon review, we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) because the factual allegations contained in the complaint do not entitle plaintiff to relief. Harris v. Johnson, 784 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1986); Spruyette v. Walters, 753 F.2d 498 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 788 (1986).

Plaintiff is not entitled to damages because judges of courts of general jurisdiction are immune from liability for their judicial acts. Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 335 (1872); Sparks v. Character and Fitness Comm. of Kentucky, 818 F.2d 541 (6th Cir.1987). Furthermore, plaintiff is not entitled to a declaratory judgment. His allegations simply do not establish that he was deprived of a right secured by the federal constitution or laws of the United States. As a result, he has not stated a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. See Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981).

The request for counsel is denied. The order of the district court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradley v. Fisher
80 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1872)
Parratt v. Taylor
451 U.S. 527 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Floyd Spruytte v. Richard Walters and Ronald Schink
753 F.2d 498 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)
Rochester Harris v. Perry Johnson, Director
784 F.2d 222 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 F.2d 297, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13850, 1987 WL 38690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-l-silverburg-v-charles-tackett-officially-and-individually-ca6-1987.