Joseph L. Dyer v. Lawrence E. Wilson

Ninth Circuit

Joseph L. Dyer v. Lawrence E. Wilson

363 F.2d 955, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5390

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 22, 1966·No. 20732_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a California state prisoner, seeks his release from custody by writ of habeas corpus. The district court denied him relief. We affirm.

By his petition appellant attacks the legality of his conviction by the Superior Court of the State of California on April 12, 1962, of the crimes of kidnapping, rape and robbery. However, he is presently serving sentences previously imposed by said court as punishment for several other crimes. His petition is premature. McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238 (1932).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a California state prisoner, seeks his release from custody by writ of habeas corpus. The district court denied him relief. We affirm.

By his petition appellant attacks the legality of his conviction by the Superior Court of the State of California on April 12, 1962, of the crimes of kidnapping, rape and robbery. However, he is presently serving sentences previously imposed by said court as punishment for several other crimes. His petition is premature. McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238 (1932).

Joseph L. Dyer v. Lawrence E. Wilson, 363 F.2d 955, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5390 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

363 F.2d 955 (Joseph L. Dyer v. Lawrence E. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related