Joseph L. Dyer v. Lawrence E. Wilson
This text of 363 F.2d 955 (Joseph L. Dyer v. Lawrence E. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, a California state prisoner, seeks his release from custody by writ of habeas corpus. The district court denied him relief. We affirm.
By his petition appellant attacks the legality of his conviction by the Superior Court of the State of California on April 12, 1962, of the crimes of kidnapping, rape and robbery. However, he is presently serving sentences previously imposed by said court as punishment for several other crimes. His petition is premature. McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238 (1932).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
363 F.2d 955, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-l-dyer-v-lawrence-e-wilson-ca9-1966.